The Federal High Court sitting in Abeokuta has sacked the Ogun State Governorship candidate of the African Democratic Congress (ADC), Biyi Otegbeye, and 26 House of Assembly candidates of the party from contesting the 2023 general elections
Penpushing reports, Otegbeye, preferred candidate of former Governor of Ogun State, Senator Ibikunle Amosun, who remained chieftain of the ruling All Progressives Congress(APC), has his ambition dashed when the court rule that the primary which produced him and other aspirants were faulty, having not being monitored by the Independent National Electoral Commission(INEC)
The opposition Labour Party(LP), it is recalled had dragged the African Democratic Congress(ADC) and its candidates to court over alleged non-compliance to the Electoral Act in the conduct of the party’s primaries, a suit which on Friday put an end to the political ambition of the candidates.
Penpushing further reports that, the judge, Justice Akintayo Aluko while delivering the judgement added that the primaries were held in violation of the Electoral Act, thereby calling on electoral commission to expunge the name of Otegbeye, and the 26 assembly candidates from the list of candidates’ cleared for the 2023 election.
The counsel to the party and all the candidates, Tunde Falola, in reaction to the judgement said the party would study details of the judgement and proceed on an appeal, stressing that the judgement is not the end of the case
“The court has given judgement in its own wisdom and it is favour of the plaintiff. As you know, this is a contest, one way or the other it has to go the way it goes, but that is no the end of the case, we have applied and we have indicated to the court that we are very interested in having access to the judgement as quick as possible with the view to sit down and analyse the judgement with the view of taking further steps in respect of the judgement’, he said.
“Constitutionally, every Nigerian, every party before the court whose judgement has been given against has the right, constitutional right to approach the higher court and ventilate his or her grievances. There are some areas in which we feel we disagree with judgement of his lordship that we intend to explore before the court of appeal. There are some areas which we feel that the positions of the lordship do not accord with the position of law, that is what we intend to explore”, he stated
Penpushing also reports that legal counsel of the Labour Party ( LP) Monday Mawah in his own submission described the judgment as welcome development, adding that it was a victory of rule of law and democracy
“Simply put, what transpired in court today is victory for rule of law and democracy. We brought an action to the court challenging the decision of INEC to countenance the list of candidates that purportedly emerged in primaries that never took place by the ADC’,Mawah said.
“When the final list of candidates were published, we were surprised to see the names of candidates of ADC and then we went to court to say if the Electoral Act says INEC must monitor primaries and then a primary was purportedly done without inviting INEC, that primary in the eye of the law is invalid and the court answered that question in the negative that the primary in which INEC was never invited can never be valid in the eye of the law and that any candidate that purportedly emerged from such primary must be removed and that was what the court did today’.
“The court agreed with us and said in the eye of the law there was no primary since there was no primary any name purportedly put on that list for ADC should be removed’, the Labour Party counsel stated
FOOTNOTE: You want to share story with us? You want to advertise with us? You need publicity for product, or service, or event? Contact us on WhatsApp +2348073463653 or email [email protected]